Unemployment Extension Does Not Help Those Who Have Exhausted Their 99 Weeks

"Help is on the way for 2.5 million Americans, including thousands in Michigan, who are unemployed.

The U.S. House of Representatives passed an unemployment extension on Thursday by a vote of 272 to 152. President Barack Obama could sign the extension as early as Thursday evening.

In some states the extension will mean retroactive payments could go out as early as next week, but there's one group that won't benefit from the extension.

They're known as '99ers,' people who have used up almost two years of unemployment benefits."

www.wwmt.com/articles/won-1379351-99ers-extension.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Does the United States Spend Too Much on Incarceration? The Conservative British Periodical The Economist Thinks So

"America is different from the rest of the world in lots of ways, many of them good. One of the bad ones is its willingness to lock up its citizens... One American adult in 100 festers behind bars (with the rate rising to one in nine for young black men). Its imprisoned population, at 2.3m, exceeds that of 15 of its states. No other rich country is nearly as punitive as the Land of the Free. The rate of incarceration is a fifth of America’s level in Britain, a ninth in Germany and a twelfth in Japan...

As a result American prisons are now packed not only with thugs and rapists but also with petty thieves, small-time drug dealers and criminals who, though scary when they were young and strong, are now too grey and arthritic to pose a threat. Some 200,000 inmates are over 50—roughly as many as there were prisoners of all ages in 1970. Prison is an excellent way to keep dangerous criminals off the streets, but the more people you lock up, the less dangerous each extra prisoner is likely to be. And since prison is expensive—$50,000 per inmate per year in California—the cost of imprisoning criminals often far exceeds the benefits, in terms of crimes averted. "

The above is from The Economist, an arguably conservative British weekly periodical.

For the entire article, please visit:

www.economist.com/node/16640389